More than any other place I have ever
lived, Washington is a talking city, an environment where words are
simultaneously the most precious and the cheapest commodity. Words
serve as weapons of political warfare, badges of honor, markers of
identity and demonstrations of expertise. Language is employed to
build up and tear down. In a town like Washington, the exercise of
power means framing the conversation. The real game here is about
dictating the terms of the debate.
This is a very different relationship
to words than the one that I have experienced in the Quaker
tradition. For Friends, the primary goal of all words is to provide a
pathway into truth that goes beyond our narrow attempts to define and
control it. In this view, language is meant to direct us to the
inward reality that we all have access to, the truth that will guide
us and draw us into unity. In the Friends tradition, the spoken word
is meant to be a tool of liberation, freeing us from bondage to
falsehood. This truth that we encounter together sets us free and
challenges us to reexamine our narrow interests and old assumptions.
From this perspective, the way that we
often communicate here in Washington is questionable. If words are
intended to provide a doorway into the truth that lies beyond us,
what happens when we speak primarily to get our own way, so that our
own perspective prevails while others are discounted? What is the
spiritual effect of a culture that views language as a means to gain
power over others, rather than as a tool to produce transformed lives
that bless and surprise everyone?
If the United States' political climate
is any indication, communication that cajoles, confuses and coerces
leads us into division, alienation and violence. When our speech
becomes simply one more method of waging cultural warfare against
those we disagree with, we are left without means to find the common
ground that could resolve our conflicts. A society that has stopped
listening is not far from civil war.
I believe that God has called me to
engage with the wider world, to work for justice and reconciliation
in a culture that struggles to live within even basic forms of
civility, much less mutual understanding and love. Yet, at the same
time, I am convinced that it would be a mistake for me to accept the
wider culture's destructive norms of communication. What might it
look like to passionately participate in American society without
buying into its patterns of verbal combat and battle-hardened talking
points?
This question is alive for me as I work
among my friends in the movement for economic justice. All of us have
become accustomed to communicating in ways that are basically
violent. We instinctively defend ourselves from attack and ensure
that our point of view is spoken. We perceive (correctly) that if we
do not barge in and say our piece, others who are more forceful will
do all the talking.
This is hard for me, because I am used
to the Quaker mode of conversation in which long pauses are normal.
Stretches of silence provide time to reflect on what has been said,
and to listen for the voice of the Spirit in our midst. Among
Friends, there is an expectation that conversations provide an
opportunity to listen collectively, and this shared openness to God
and one another helps to develop trust and solidarity within the
group.
When I first became involved in the
Occupy movement, one of my great hopes was that I could help to
introduce Quaker practices of deep listening and collective
discernment into the movement. And during the first days of Occupy
DC, we had some remarkable successes. But it soon became apparent
that almost all of us were more familiar with the combative,
self-asserting style of communication that we have inherited from the
wider culture.
Even as we rise to challenge the
domination of the 1%, we seem stuck communicating in ways that keep
us fighting one another. It is hard to see how the 99% can ever be
free so long as we continue to use the modes of discourse that have
been thrust upon us by the wealthy elite and their corporations.
A real nonviolent revolution in this
country cannot be simply about economic indicators; we must transform
the very culture we live in, including the way we speak and make
decisions together. It is truly a beautiful thing when we really hear
one another and experience solidarity spreading throughout the room.
Nevertheless, this way of hearing is much more difficult to achieve
when we are all worried about whether we will get a chance to speak.
For my own part, I wrestle with how to
stay grounded in the Quaker mode of deep listening and trust while
still being able to speak to my friends who do not share this
practice. How can I engage in our shared business in a way that
invites the whole group into greater openness and depth? How can I
keep my own grounding in the practice of patient waiting on God, even
as all the cultural forces around me clamor for immediate reaction?
How can I share this practice of trusting attentiveness with my
friends and co-workers? What would it look like to hold open a space
for shared exploration in truth?