The early decades of the
Christian movement were infused with a radical sense of a new Kingdom
that turns the whole world upside down, but things changed as the Church
began to settle into life in Empire. It is tough to swim against the
current of the dominant culture. As time went on and the expectation
of Jesus' second coming gradually diminished, the followers of
the Way began to adapt to the
expectations of Greco-Roman society. Decades passed, and Jesus
still had not returned to establish his outward reign on earth, so the Church began to
develop a meantime theology,
seeking to live peaceably - and unobtrusively - within the
Empire.
This made all kinds of sense. After
all, Rome regularly carried out persecutions against those who
refused to submit to the cosmopolitan religion of the Empire, to
worship the Emperor as a god. Christians were already in very serious
trouble much of the time. Under such circumstances, the temptation to
blend in and do as the Romans do must have been huge.
But this decision to compromise with
the surrounding culture came at a price. The white-hot gospel of
Jesus upended the social hierarchies that were so integral to the
internal logic of Empire - master above slave, lord above servant,
husband above wife. Yet, as the Christian community struggled to get
along in the Empire, all of these harmful dynamics reemerged in the
life of the Church. Why?
The radically counter-cultural gospel
of Jesus simply could not coexist with the Church's compromise with
the unjust culture of the Mediterranean world. The only force that
was able to hold this explosive witness together was the intense
experience and expectation of Christ's presence and coming Kingdom. A
new Order was coming that would replace the old ways of Empire.
But the years passed. Decades went by
without the outwardly visible return of Jesus that the community had
assumed would take place. Jesus did not come riding on the clouds,
taking his seat on the throne of David and establishing a millennial
kingdom for all the world to see. Gradually, much of the Church lost
a sense of Christ's immanence. Jesus became someone out there,
beyond the sky. His Kingdom became a distant reality, something that
would eventually take shape at some point in the future - but
certainly not today. For much of the Christian community, Jesus
became a myth rather than an experienced relationship.
This feeling of distance from the
Kingdom of God has made it even more difficult to resist the
relentless pressure of Empire. It may be precisely because the
Church has experienced and proclaimed God's Kingdom as existing only
in a far-off heaven that we have been so susceptible to the
distortions and compromises of a long succession of human kingdoms.
As long as the followers of the Way had
a sense of Christ's living presence and power in the world, miracles
happened. The sick were healed, the dead were raised and the poor had
good news preached to them. Men and women entered into their
originally intended state of full equality, just as they had been
before the Fall. Jesus - not as mythical figure in some distant
heaven, but as a viscerally present Teacher and Lord - broke down the divisions between Greek and Jew, slave and free, male and female. In this imminent experience of his Kingdom, all became
brothers and sisters, functioning together as a living and growing
body.
It was in this way - through the
experience of Jesus himself, living within each believer and in the
midst of the gathered community - that the Quaker movement was able
to re-discover the radical equality of Christ's Kingdom. In an age of
deep patriarchy, Quakers spiritually empowered women just like the
earliest church did. Women served as elders, apostolic ministers and
evangelists. Women and men labored side by side for the radical
gospel of the Risen Jesus, and all were free to preach as the Spirit
gave the words.
This powerful experience of Jesus is
available to us today. It is this personal and community experience
of God's life and presence that can break us out of our fallen
addiction to racism, patriarchy, homophobia and all the many ways
that this world encourages us to marginalize one another. When we
walk in the light of Christ's Spirit, God gives us power to resist
the injustice and false assumptions of our present culture, this
current manifestation of Empire.
Are we ready to embrace the white-hot
gospel of a present and living Kingdom? Are we prepared for the
subtle and radical ways that the Holy Spirit calls us to live in
contrast to the dominant culture? Do we have the courage to embrace
the love that raises up the lowly and humbles the proud? Is today the
day when we will meet the Risen Lord for ourselves?
4 comments:
To tie into the current dialogue over the papacy, historically the notion of the papacy developed when Christians got with the empire. And the Church structure which developed, and still exists in the RC Church, largely apes imperial patterns. The pope is the religious equivalent of the political emperor, and it goes down from there. It is not the structure of the Body of Christ, where no part is better than any other part, as Paul taught.
I agree with the thrust of this post that we need to vigilant in orienting our attention to God's continual presence. Today, however, we work from a veiled Deism which makes embodying the kind of attention you mention a unique challenge. Also, I am not quite convinced that it has much to do with the establishment of the Roman Catholic Church or, institutional controls for that matter. Did, and do, negative things happen under such rubrics, sure. Man has proclivities toward sinful engagements and the world and institutions can, though not always, focus such sins and support them. But though this is a reality, I would say that what you are discussing is more the natural proclivity of being human: The continual reality that Man forgets his Creator. This theme jumps off the pages of the Old Testament. Thus, there should be little surprise that we constantly lose our direction. Paul, James, John, and Peter were also continually having to remind the small churches of their time to remember what God had done for them through Christ and to orient their affections accordingly. I point this out because it continues to be an overreach to blame the RC Church for certain ills that are more the ills of being human persons saved but being sanctified. If we would like to elevate something from the early church, it should be that they were as forgetful as we are and that the same God who was present offering grace and mercy to have courage to face their troubles is present with us today to do the same. This kind of persistence by God seems to be the substance of the ‘white-hot Gospel’ and it is something of which we all, regardless of denomination, need to be reminded.
Thank you for the encouragement to remember His presence and the continual grace and mercy his extends toward us all.
Our individual experiences of Christ come in many forms, some of them more akin to the cool "sweetness" Isaac Penington articulates, and some of them as the "white-hot" encounters you describe.
Meeting with people alive in that awareness, however, can be discomforting. Are we really open to it in our Quaker circles?
Let's not forget how quickly the early Quaker leadership began tamping down the emotional "excesses" of that first decade of the movement.
There's a song sung by Fernando Ortega at what looks to be the celebration of Ruth Graham's transition to heaven called "Give me Jesus". The basic theme is summed up in the words "you can have all the world but give me Jeus". Until your experience of Jesus, the living Christ, is such that you can sing that song with all your heart and all your mind and all your soul, you will always find a reason to compromise your individual call to love as Jesus loved.
Post a Comment